Animals

Started by Jesus,

Jesus (Member) ·

• Pet store

Place where you can buy pets, obviously. Dogs, cats, parrots and more! (/buypet)

• Faction use

Ya' know police dogs or K9 right? That'll be awesome!

 

matronex (Member) ·

I think this could be really cool.
But I don't think it is possible.

ɢᴀᴜᴅʏ ᴘᴀᴄᴋ ᴋɪᴅᴅᴏ (Member) ·

K9s on RP servers are used as NPCs when cops search houses or other places and that's okay but using them to chase another player is just plain stupid and gives you unfair advantage.

I partially Support  this

Palamara (Member) ·
Just now, ɢᴀᴜᴅʏ ᴘᴀᴄᴋ ᴋɪᴅᴅᴏ said:

K9s on RP servers are used as NPCs when cops search houses or other places and that's okay but using them to chase another player is just plain stupid and gives you unfair advantage.

I partially Support  this

The unfair advantage exists in real life Niggus mane

ɢᴀᴜᴅʏ ᴘᴀᴄᴋ ᴋɪᴅᴅᴏ (Member) ·
1 minute ago, Palamara said:

The unfair advantage exists in real life Niggus mane

Yeah but this is a game after all and I doubt that PD would create a special division just to chase suspects via this advantage.

Palamara (Member) ·
Just now, ɢᴀᴜᴅʏ ᴘᴀᴄᴋ ᴋɪᴅᴅᴏ said:

Yeah but this is a game after all and I doubt that PD would create a special division just to chase suspects via this advantage.

Except they already did irl

but yeh it's a game

shame that the "it's a game" argument doesn't apply to pretty much anything else because "RP IT!"

ɢᴀᴜᴅʏ ᴘᴀᴄᴋ ᴋɪᴅᴅᴏ (Member) ·
Just now, Palamara said:

Except they already did irl

but yeh it's a game

shame that the "it's a game" argument doesn't apply to pretty much anything else because "RP IT!"

Well, chasing suspects with NPC dogs are still stupid but if you really want this to be accepted you can RP one K9 yourself brother.

Palamara (Member) ·
Just now, ɢᴀᴜᴅʏ ᴘᴀᴄᴋ ᴋɪᴅᴅᴏ said:

Well, chasing suspects with NPC dogs are still stupid but if you really want this to be accepted you can RP one K9 yourself brother.

78454f505b21e7994ffa7cba39a06dc7ea604fb6

BurgundySuit (Premium Member) ·

Yeah, if this could be possible I would support it, but just RP'ing animals would be ok for now.

lord. (Member) ·

get the modding to mod in custom animal objects n ur set

 

although theyd look a bit dumb imo id rather rp  it

Markus. (Member) ·

nah lmao, there's something called rp

Dalek (Member) ·

This would be cool, but people would MG having dogs so much. GTA: SA was never built to include animals, so glhf trying to implement realistic looking animals and animations.

Crawler (Member) ·
17 minutes ago, Dalek said:

This would be cool, but people would MG having dogs so much. GTA: SA was never built to include animals, so glhf trying to implement realistic looking animals and animations.

good point

chilli943 (Management) ·

Animals are now a real possibility with the advent of 0.3.7-DL and we'll need to discuss how we want to implement features such as K9 dogs and player owned animals, there has been limited discussion in the Discord already (I believe) and we definitely want to implement animals in some capacity.

 

If you have any idea on how animals should be implemented and how you would want K9 dogs to function, just reply on this thread!

Templar (Member) ·

Would love to see K9s being roleplayed adequately by people. I'm all for it.

Boogeyman (Member) ·
20 hours ago, Chilli943 said:

Animals are now a real possibility with the advent of 0.3.7-DL and we'll need to discuss how we want to implement features such as K9 dogs and player owned animals, there has been limited discussion in the Discord already (I believe) and we definitely want to implement animals in some capacity.

 

If you have any idea on how animals should be implemented and how you would want K9 dogs to function, just reply on this thread!

 

Make it like a coin toss cops can do /K9s(pawn) and then /K9a(ttack) ID. When they do the attack command there is a 50-50 chance that the dog will either catch or miss the targeted ID. Now it will be up to players to RP the outcome.

kane (Member) ·

This is a better suggestion explored when we're more in depth with the server. 

 

Thanks for the suggestion but this won't be feasible at the time.